Re: [wg-review] [IDNO] OR [IDNH] addendum

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

Mr. Sondow,
I have seen this provision used by unacredited "Registries", who do not contribute to ICANN in order to
avoid liability in selling rights to a domain name to several different registrants.  ICANN expressed
complete lack of authority to deal with the problem, which of course is true.  It is my understanding
that a 501 c 3 corp cannot invoke the powers of the courts to impliment it's stated goals.  Obviously
there are exceptions but ICANN'S policies are impotent in effect.
Sincerely

Michael Sondow wrote:

> Sotiropoulos wrote:
> >
> > Here is an example of one progressive registrar's Agreement: > http://www.gandi.net/contract.en.txt
>
> Do you consider this progressive:
>
> "21 - The client agrees that its registration of the SLD name shall
> be
> subject to suspension, cancellation, or transfer pursuant to any
> ICANN-adopted policy, or pursuant to any registrar or registry
> procedure
> not inconsistent with an ICANN-adopted policy, (1) to correct
> mistakes
> by Registrar or the Registry in registering the name or (2) for the
> resolution of disputes concerning the SLD name."
>
> M.S.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
begin:vcard 
n:Dierker;Eric
tel;fax:(858) 571-8497
tel;work:(858) 571-8431
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:Eric@Hi-Tek.com
end:vcard