RE: [wg-review] [IDNO] OR [IDNH] addendum

["Cindy Merry" <tomerrys@inter-linc.net>]

Michael:  I don't know if it's progressive, but it sounds like their
attempt to protect themselves from liability if they allow you to register
a SLD name that ICANN or ICANN policies decide isn't yours.  Maybe not
progressive but protective?  Cindy



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf
Of Michael Sondow
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 5:20 PM
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Cc: sotiris@hermesnetwork.com
Subject: Re: [wg-review] [IDNO] OR [IDNH] addendum

Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
> Here is an example of one progressive registrar's Agreement: >
http://www.gandi.net/contract.en.txt

Do you consider this progressive:

"21 - The client agrees that its registration of the SLD name shall
be
subject to suspension, cancellation, or transfer pursuant to any
ICANN-adopted policy, or pursuant to any registrar or registry
procedure
not inconsistent with an ICANN-adopted policy, (1) to correct
mistakes
by Registrar or the Registry in registering the name or (2) for the
resolution of disputes concerning the SLD name."

M.S.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html