RE: [wg-review] 14. [BY CONSENSUS] decisions preparation by consensus, Report requested by Members

["Cindy Merry" <tomerrys@inter-linc.net>]

Trying to keep up with everything :)...I agree with this also.  Jefsey
don't forget about your motion on the archives and how we can make it
easier for them to be useful.  Cindy Merry

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf
Of Chris McElroy
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:08 PM
To: Jefsey Morfin
Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 14. [BY CONSENSUS] decisions preparation by
consensus, Report requested by Members

Agreed. Getting some new domains there Jeffsey? LOL. Good choices.
Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jefsey Morfin" <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 8:46 AM
Subject: [wg-review] 14. [BY CONSENSUS] decisions preparation by consensus,
Report requested by Members


> Dear Chair,
> Greg's proposition concerning consensus study and practice widely
accepted
> and discussed by this WG-Review, I propose a new subject as:
>
> 14. [BY CONSENSUS] decision preparation by consensus, Report requested by
> Members
>
> As for the other subjects:
>
> 1. I propose to open the site http://byconsensus.org to maintain a
current
> status of the pending questions and achievements
> '
> 2. I propose to start with the following general questions from Greg and
> many other posts:
>
>      -  consensus vs voting
>      -  group and technical consensus definitions
>      -  guidelines towards a consensus
>      -  consensus tools
>      -  bad practices: a compendium of errors against consensus
>
> 3. I suggest that Greg Burton is proposed to use that frame to enter all
> the points he has proposed or received in response,so we may have a good
> basis for a Center of Interests work.
>
> 4. I repeat my motion which has now been seconded by several Members:
>
> "
> The WG-Review has observed that reaching a consensus within the DNSO was
> basically hampered by the lack of definition and therefore of common
> understanding of what a DNSO consensus is and how it is determined
> "
>
> The common target would to offer and maintain to the advantage of the
whole
> ICANN community a real experience and qualification about consensus
> building and achievement. So it will practical serve te DNSO, the NC and
> the ICANN.
>
> Jefsey
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html