<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem
I think there a lot of bad comparsons here, not of which I like.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Joanna Lane
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 2:41 PM
To: eric@springbreaktravel.com
Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem
Eric,
Are you advocating we adopt a system that does not require a single voice to
be heard or vote to be cast from a community of 350,000,000 people in order
to elect the person who will represent them in the global community?
That's the comparison I see most clearly.
Joanna Lane
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 9:38 AM
To: 'Bret Busby'; sotiris@hermesnetwork.com
Cc: 'Cindy Merry'; wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem
The electoral college is the system that resulted when two opposing groups
compromised in order to establish a functioning system. Some of the United
State's founders did not trust the masses to make educated decisions about
who would be the most qualified to lead the country. Others wanted to
insure that the people had the ultimate say in how officials were elected.
And so they compromised! It also insures that the votes of people living in
less populated areas are as powerful as those that live in the larger
cities. There are some interesting comparisons between what we are doing
here and the establishment of the US Electoral College.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Bret Busby
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 3:42 AM
To: sotiris@hermesnetwork.com
Cc: Cindy Merry; wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem
Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
> 1/9/01 6:02:23 PM, "Cindy Merry" <tomerrys@inter-linc.net> wrote:
>
> >Bottom line is policies and procedures, clearly explained, for this work
> >group would most likely have kept those who dropped out or were
overwhelmed
> >on board with the rest of us.
>
> Well put, Cindy!
>
> I support the vote and an Electoral College framework. It's good enough
for nation-states (*even* the US), it should be good enough us. People are
> running economies and goverments based on majorities... what makes us any
different?
>
Wasn't it the electoral college framwork, that ensured that a
democratically elected president of the USA, lost the election?
--
Bret Busby
Armadale, West Australia
......................................
"So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the
answer means."
- Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
- Douglas Adams, 1988
......................................
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|