Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested

["Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>]

I've been away from a couple of days. I have over 200 messages, mostly unread. 
I don't know what kind of bizarre turn the discussion has taken, but OF COURSE all WG members, including NC members, can participate fully in the WG.

And to address Philip's last sentence, YES. If members of the NC recognize that change is needed that is something to be welcomed and encouraged.
--Milton Mueller

>>> "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be> 01/10/01 05:37AM >>>
Joop ask the question "whether Peter, Elisabeth, Erica, Philip, Ken and
Theresa should participate in any votes directly concerning proposals for
reform of the DNSO and the NC".

[snip]
I believe the review process is all about a recognition that change is
required. Members of the NC and the NC as a body are advocates of that view.

Philip



--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html 


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html