RE: [wg-review] 7. [NAME COUNCIL] Secretary and secretariat - Motion to the Chair

["Cindy Merry" <tomerrys@inter-linc.net>]

Jefsey:  In going through my e-mails I never found this on the posted
e-mails.  I do agree with your rephrasing of the motion.  Thanks,  Cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: Jefsey Morfin [mailto:jefsey@hotpop.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 11:41 AM
To: Cindy Merry
Subject: RE: [wg-review] 7. [NAME COUNCIL] Secretary and secretariat -
Motion to the Chair

Dear Cindy,
You are obviously right. I therefore rephrase my motion to the Chair as
follows:

Motion:
"
The number and the complexity of the various printed and electronic
documents the NC must produce and archive has been identified as one of the
difficulty to relate and therefore to reach a consensus with or through the
NC. The WG-Review therefore request that the NC elects a Secretary among
its Members, as usually do the public bodies. His/Her duties will include
supervising the Scribe and the Staff secretariat on behalf of the NC,
verifying that a consistent and clear Subject composition system is
respected for an easy retrieval of the archives. No NC document will be
take effect without a prior final approval of the Secretary signified by a
leading mention in the Subject.  For the same reasons It is strongly
recommended that the same system is adopted all over the ICANN. ICANN
bylaws will be modified as appropriate to accommodate this motion.
"


On 21:57 07/01/01, Cindy Merry said:
>Jefsey:
>
>I like this idea.  I have been going through the several URL's and trying
>to understand the different decisions and directives.  I would add to your
>suggested motion that the URL's in the archives should have a "Clear
>definition about content".  This would help interested folks become more
>informed and assist in directing them to the pertinent information.
>
>Cindy Merry
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf
>Of Jefsey Morfin
>Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 9:21 AM
>To: wg-review@dnso.org
>Subject: [wg-review] 7. [NAME COUNCIL] Secretary vs. secretariat
>
>To all.
>I though about Elisabeth Porteneuve's mail of yesterday. She says that now
>she is elected to the NC she has to give up being the Secretary of the
>DNSO. I also observe the support received by my mail describing my
>difficulty
>to understand the WG-Review situation from the NC is concerned. To help
>Elisabeth has kindly proposed several URLs I declined as I feel
incompetent
>to go through the NC Archives and decide what are the real decisions.

<snip>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html