Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC, TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/12/01 9:56:37 AM, Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> wrote:

>One of the major concerns of those opposed to an individuals
>constituency, in any form, is that it would be a magnet for angry
>individuals with "axes to grind".  The vast majority of people don't
>have axes to grind, and don't have time participate, so the angry ones
>will take over the constituency.  But angry individuals with axes to
>grind are not representative of individuals in general. 
>This is not just theory, of course -- to date this has been observed in
>every single attempt to organize an individuals constituency.  I think
>it is this phenomenon, incidentally, which led to the board's cooling
>toward Joop's IDNO -- initially there was support on the board, but that
>evaporated when it became clear that the IDNO was a code name for the
>"anti-ICANN" constituency.

I already asked this one, but you did not reply:  What is your purpose for being on this List?  Seems to me that you probably don't think a Review is 
necessary either.  Sounds like you think everything's been peachy to date.  Sounds like you have an axe to grind Mr. Crispin.  Please let us know just 
what it is you're hoping to accomplish on this WG.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc. 




--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html