Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested

["YJ Park \(MINC\)" <yjpark@minc.org>]

Kent and all,

First, let us think of why we are doing this review process.
The answer is simple and clear.

"We want to see DNSO workable within ICANN."

Are we doing review process through WG model to show off
"DNSO is trying at its best!" implementing bottom-up approach
described in white paper which could be its natural mandate for
both dnso and icann? NO.

We are struggling from the DNSO's substantial troubles to solve
them not to just touch them.

To have real solutions for dnso, let this small group who committed to
itself to suggesting their recommendations to dnso have enough working
days to do so. No reason to hurry up. No reason to wrap up this group.

According to this below schedule, it is very likely that this whole review
process will end up with ICANN frills.

At least this schedule has five days for NC to review prior to NC call,
which has been rare, the result can be very obvious based upon the
accumulated practice in the NC.

"NC recommends ICANN staff to come up with its final document for
public comment......" which doesn't solve dnso's problem at all.

We are going back to WG A, B and C story which ended up with
ICANN staff's professional hard works.

I am sure people here want to keep ICANN/DNSO.
That's why we all are keen to make it work out!

Please, let this group reach their own position before DNSO/NC
and ICANN/Board.

Thanks,
YJ

> This, then, is the schedule (it was buried down in the note, so I
> thought I would bring it up to the top):
>
> > January 15, 2001: All Comments to NC Review Task Force
> > January 19, 2001: DNSO Review Report v1 to NC for review prior to
January
> > 24th NC call.
> > January 24, 2001: NC Discussion of DNSO Review Report v1. Task Force
> > incorporates comments resulting from discussion.
> > January 26, 2001: Posting of DNSO Review Report v2 (V2 includes NC
> > discussion) for DNSO public comment (Jan. 26-Feb. 9).
> > February 9, 2001: End of DNSO Public Comment period
> > February 12, 2001: Forward DNSO Review Report with public comments to
ICANN.
> >
> > February 14, 2001: ICANN posts DNSO Review Report for Public Comment
>
> Given that the NC is required to post its documents for public review,
> and that ICANN requires 30 days public comment before the Melbourne
> meeting, this schedule really isn't leaving much time at all for the
> people drafting the reports.  For example, YJ will give the Task Force a
> bunch of stuff on the 15th, plus comments will come in from other
> sources, and the TF will have to integrate all those into a report in
> *4* days.  And the ICANN staff, it appears, has essentially zero time to
> prepare a report before the Melbourne meeting.
>
> It is perhaps worth noting that the ICANN public comment period will
> undoubtedly include setting up a forum on the ICANN public comment
> forum, a threaded, web-based system.


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html