RE: [wg-review] 7. [NAME COUNCIL] Secretary and secretariat - Motion to the Chair

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Chair,
Here is a seconded motion. I obviously suggest personally the name
of Elisabeth Porteneuve for this key elected position within the NC,
both for her past positive secretariat management role and for the
trust every DNSO member has in her.
Jefsey

On 03:29 12/01/01, Cindy Merry said:
>Jefsey:  In going through my e-mails I never found this on the posted
>e-mails.  I do agree with your rephrasing of the motion.  Thanks,  Cindy
>
>Dear Cindy,
>You are obviously right. I therefore rephrase my motion to the Chair as
>follows:
>
>Motion:
>"
>The number and the complexity of the various printed and electronic
>documents the NC must produce and archive has been identified as one of the
>difficulties to relate and then to reach a consensus with or through the
>NC. The WG-Review therefore request that the NC elects a Secretary among
>its Members, as usually do the public bodies. His/Her duties will include
>supervising the Scribe and the Staff secretariat on behalf of the NC,
>verifying that a consistent and clear Subject composition system is
>respected for an easy retrieval of the archives. No NC document will be
>take effect without a prior final approval of the Secretary signified by a
>leading mention in the Subject. It is strongly recommended that the
>same system is adopted all over the ICANN. ICANN bylaws will be
>modified as appropriate to accommodate this motion.
>"
>
>
>On 21:57 07/01/01, Cindy Merry said:
> >Jefsey:
> >
> >I like this idea.  I have been going through the several URL's and trying
> >to understand the different decisions and directives.  I would add to your
> >suggested motion that the URL's in the archives should have a "Clear
> >definition about content".  This would help interested folks become more
> >informed and assist in directing them to the pertinent information.
> >
> >Cindy Merry
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf
> >Of Jefsey Morfin
> >Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 9:21 AM
> >To: wg-review@dnso.org
> >Subject: [wg-review] 7. [NAME COUNCIL] Secretary vs. secretariat
> >
> >To all.
> >I though about Elisabeth Porteneuve's mail of yesterday. She says that now
> >she is elected to the NC she has to give up being the Secretary of the
> >DNSO. I also observe the support received by my mail describing my
> >difficulty
> >to understand the WG-Review situation from the NC is concerned. To help
> >Elisabeth has kindly proposed several URLs I declined as I feel
>incompetent
> >to go through the NC Archives and decide what are the real decisions.
>
><snip>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html