Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested

["YJ Park (MINC)" <yjpark@minc.org>]

Hello all,

Even though some of you don't like some posts by some people,
it is recommended to interpret the different view or position
themselves without any mixed personality distortion.

Can we please write message more politely and more positively?

Everyone has been doing her/his best including Theresa from her perspective.

Thank you.
YJ

> > I've read the string of messages under this subject heading and am
somewhat
> > surprised to see that there remains some confusion about the deadline
for
> > the working group's report per it's mandate. The revised deadline has
been
> > known since the working group's establishment, and reminders were sent
out.
> > For your convenience, I've attached for the working group the reminder
sent
> > to you as Chair of this working group on the deadline for the working
> > group's comments based on it's mandate (a reminder of the revised
deadline
> > was also sent to each constituency representative, GA chair and
co-chair,
> > the task force receiving comments from all, and the NC). As you know,
the
> > adjustment made in the schedule for the DNSO review is to accommodate
the
> > working group's deadline of Jan. 15th, as set when the working group and
> > it's mandate were established.
>
> This is one of the most authoritarian, if not to say totalitarian,
> messages I have ever seen in this four-year-long process. I have
> been derided for accusing ICANN of being a dictatorship, but if this
> is not an "order from on high" I don't know what is.
>
> Who is this woman? How dare she tell any of us what to do and when?
>
> This is the reason that most of the best people have left this
> process. It makes one want to bury the Internet forever.
>
> M.S.
>


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html