Re: [wg-review] [Comment Please] Set timetable again or Review WG

["YJ Park (MINC)" <yjpark@minc.org>]

Thank you, Roeland.

This 11-page paper will be attached in the report as reference document
submitted by one of Review WG members as alternative suggestion to dnso.

Thanks,
YJ

> My, my my, that *is* an impressive schedule. In fact the only way I can
see
> to make it, is that we have a good jump start. Fortunately, I have just
the
> thing. I hope all of you have an Acrobat PDF Reader. If you don't. I have
> HTML, TXT, and Word97 DOC versions (available at
> http://files.dnso.net/dox/politicks). The ICANN has seen this document
> already, in Berlin. It was one of the starter documents at the Paris
meeting
> (before DNSO existed). It was created, in one week, on the ORSC list.
Mikki
> Barry was the editor. This is the same illustrious group that brought you
> the original NewCo proposal.
>
> Note that, there is no mention of formal constituency structures anywhere.
I
> don't expect anyone to take this at face value. I submit this in the hopes
> of getting this group heading ... in ANY direction that does not include a
> curved trajectory (circles). IMHO, we can do worse than this, for a
starting
> point.
>
> We don't have a lot of time here.
>
> PS. Since y'all didn't object to the pictures, I figured that y'all
wouldn't
> object to a PDF file containing substantive content instead. It's not
> eye-candy, rather ... brain fodder ... I hope.
>
> --
> ROELAND M.J. MEYER
> Managing Director
> Morgan Hill Software Company, Inc.
> TEL: +001 925 373 3954
> FAX: +001 925 373 9781
> http://www.mhsc.com
> mailto: rmeyer@mhsc.com
>
>
> > From: YJ Park (MINC) [mailto:yjpark@minc.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 8:32 AM
> >
> > WG members and four WG leaders,
> >
> > Since this group is working on review process,
> > every process even within this group should meet the rules
> > and criteria.
> > There should be no exception on this.
> >
> > Therefore, it is almost impossible for this group to have
> > position paper
> > submission(only formaly done by registrar.com regarding dnso quality)
> > and to reach "consensus" process or position-setting process
> > with given
> > time by NC.
> >
> > Unfortunately, many NC members are quiet about this issue and some
> > members want this group to give its promised report to NC by Jan. 15.
> > I have seen NC extend its due date in several cases earlier,
> > therefore,
> > there should be no problem.
> >
> > [Jan 15. Designated report from Review WG Chair to NC Review TF.]
> >
> > Promise is promise!!
> > As promised, the Review WG (observation) report will be delivered to
> > NC review task force on Jan 15 with condition that Review WG is going
> > to submit its progress report on Feb 20.
> >
> > ========================================
> > Feb 9 - 14.  Review WG Position Paper Submission
> > Feb 14 - 19 Review WG Position Paper Comment Period.
> > Feb 20         Review WG Position Paper Delivered to NC
> > ========================================
> >
> > Since this Jan 15's observation report is not going to be
> > public position
> > of  this Review working group, I am seeking your understanding on
> > submitting this report with bunch of papers or commments or even poll
> > results made in this group.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > YJ
> >
> > FYI. [Appendix 1] The first timetable of Review Working Group.
> >
> > Dec. 19 - 22 :
> > Review WG was formed by NC and its press release
> > have been prepared.
> >
> > Dec. 23 - 26 :
> > The press release was announced through icann-announce list
> > on Dec. 23 and WG members had its brief and informal introduction
> > session.
> >
> > Dec. 27 - Jan 4:
> > Ten topics with questions from NC Review TF was circulated.
> > Three topics has been added by WG members including IDNH,
> > sTLD and GA chair election. However most discussion has been
> > focused on Constituencies - Structure - so far.
> >
> > Jan 5 - Jan 9:
> >
> > Call for Position Paper on each topic, 13 topics until Jan 9.
> >
> > Jan 10 - Jan 11:
> >
> > Comments from members on the presented position papers.
> >
> > Jan 12 - Jan 14:
> >
> > Progress Report will be submitted to this group and will have
> > another consulation from this group before it is presented to NC.
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html