Re: [wg-review] [Draft] Review Working Group's Executive Summary

[Sandy Harris <sandy@storm.ca>]

Chris McElroy wrote:
> 
> To the chair and to all concerned:
> 
> I am going to unsubscribe from this list. The process is tainted beyond any
> reasonable person's belief. ...
> 
> There is no real effort on ICANN's part or the NC's part to get any input
> from the public. There is simply a process put into place to make it
> "appear" as if they sought public opinion. It is a scam. ...
> 
> As for my own efforts, I refuse to further the deceit by my participation in
> it. Here we have examples of politics at it's very worst. ICANN is not a
> legitimate nonprofit entity. ...

Nothing you are saying is new.

> I will continue to fight this fraudulent process on my own through my
> Legislators in the US. ...

Instead of fighting it on your own, consider joining one or more of the
organisations such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation which have been
pushing for a more open process since before ICANN was created.

See 
http://www.eff.org/pub/Infrastructure/DNS_control/ICANN_IANA_IAHC/
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html