Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

SECONDED, IF NEED BE.

Greg Burton wrote:

> It seems clear that there is widespread - almost consensus - support for us
> to recommend a constituency of some kind here.
>
> Could Joanna or someone please prepare and post a clean statement of the
> current motion for inclusion of material? I believe that was Chris or
> David's motion and the statement of differences between atlarge and a dnso
> constituency.
>
> Has that motion been seconded? If so, then I'd like Joop to prepare a vote
> on it. I think everyone has had plenty of time to discuss the concept -
> everything else is details of structure and implementation. Perhaps taking
> that discussion to the GA list could involve more affected people, and also
> reduce the volume here.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> sidna@feedwriter.com
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
begin:vcard 
n:Dierker;Eric
tel;fax:(858) 571-8497
tel;work:(858) 571-8431
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:Eric@Hi-Tek.com
end:vcard