Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH

[Bret Busby <bret@clearsol.iinet.net.au>]

Greg Burton wrote:
> 
> It seems clear that there is widespread - almost consensus - support for us
> to recommend a constituency of some kind here.
> 
> Could Joanna or someone please prepare and post a clean statement of the
> current motion for inclusion of material? I believe that was Chris or
> David's motion and the statement of differences between atlarge and a dnso
> constituency.
> 
> Has that motion been seconded? If so, then I'd like Joop to prepare a vote
> on it. I think everyone has had plenty of time to discuss the concept -
> everything else is details of structure and implementation. Perhaps taking
> that discussion to the GA list could involve more affected people, and also
> reduce the volume here.
> 
> Regards,
> Greg
> 

In relation to the motion to which I understand that the above applies;
I believe that the motion included two parts - the first indicating that
the "at large" thing" is a waste of time, and, the second proposing a
new constituency for individual domain name owners/holders. I had
proposed the motion, due to its content, also include a proposal to
institute a constituency for individuals (who are not eligible to be in
any other constituency), to ensure that all users of the Internet, can
have a say, via the constituencies, if the constituencies are to exist,
and, providing that the users of the Internet are made aware of the
constituencies, and, their right to particpate.

I do not remember seeing any response to my proposal, and, I am
wondering whether I am the only one on the list, who believes that all
Internet users should be allowed to participate, given that the propsed
motion appears to condemn the "at large" thing, as a complete waste of
time.

I therefore request response to my propsal, that I have described.

I refer you to the first part of the proposed motion, which part refers
to the "at large" thing, on the basis that my understanding of which
motion the above mentions, is correct, as my grounds for my proposal as
being appropriate in response to the above message, and, this thread,
given the message that was distributed, about relevance of discussions.

-- 

Bret Busby

Armadale, West Australia

......................................
"So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the
answer means."
 - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
 - Douglas Adams, 1988 
......................................
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html