Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH

[Michael Sondow <msondow@iciiu.org>]

Olivier Crepin-Leblond wrote:

> The length to which you go in hating ISOC and CORE is amazing.

I don't have to go to any lengths. Crispin and/or Crocker are always
there to remind me.

> Even *if* ISOC and CORE had a significant hand in the decision
> process achieved thus far, they didn't do such a bad job, did they ?

Is that your opinion? All I've seen is endless diversionary debates
on details before any decisions have been made, and then a long and
pretentious demand from Crispin that a statement be issued saying
that WGs can do no valid work. He doesn't mention that he's the
cause of the lack of valid work.

But what's the use? You're on one side, the so-far winning side of
the powerful, and I'm on the other. Your people have gotten their
way once again, here in this WG, so you're feeling pretty good. But
the day will come when you lose your grip, and then we'll see who it
is that has been "sidetracking".

M.S.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html