RE: [wg-review] [CONSENSUS] IS A LOADED TERM...

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Non-starter. Holding up the report means effectively cancelling it.
WG-Review can then be accused, rightfully, of being non-productive and a
failure.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sotiropoulos [mailto:sotiris@hermesnetwork.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 2:39 PM
> To: eric@springbreaktravel.com; 'Eric Dierker';
> eric@springbreaktravel.com
> Cc: 'Greg Burton'; wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-review] [CONSENSUS] IS A LOADED TERM...
> 
> 
> 1/15/01 5:39:43 PM, "Eric" <eric@springbreaktravel.com> wrote:
> 
> >It is my understanding that Sotiropoulos is making a motion 
> that we include
> >a addendum that explains the problems that we have had 
> agreeing on what a
> >consensus is.  It seems to me that would be important for 
> DNSO to understand
> >what problems need to be overcome and what terms need to be 
> more clearly
> >defined in order to make things operate more efficiently.  
> Was I incorrect
> >in my understanding?
> 
> No.  I am saying we hold up the report until we ascertain 
> just what exactly the majority in this WG consider a consensus to be.
> 
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html