<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [wg-review] [CONSENSUS] IS A LOADED TERM...
You truly are unbelievably arrogant! I could ask you the same question.
What is it that makes you assume that your opinion is any more important
than anyone else's! This is a WG established for the purpose of gathering
public opinion. And to answer your question, since you are a bit caught up
in things to notice, I seconded your poorly explained motion and asked you
to clarify after another member of this WG, whose opinion is equally as
important, pointed out a flaw. So, I guees you asked...And if you did mean
that with "all due respect" it wouldn't have been posted to the entire
group. What is the point of a question like that in an open forum!?!?
Nonetheless, the deadline is drawing near...lets not waste time. I'll take
the high road while you go back to drafting your next meaningless flame. I
think there are about two members left on the list that you haven't shat
upon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sotiropoulos [mailto:sotiris@hermesnetwork.com]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 5:51 PM
To: eric@springbreaktravel.com; eric@springbreaktravel.com; 'Eric
Dierker'
Cc: 'Greg Burton'; wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [wg-review] [CONSENSUS] IS A LOADED TERM...
1/15/01 5:52:56 PM, "Eric" <eric@springbreaktravel.com> wrote:
>I don't think that would be prudent.
With all due respect, Eric... who ASKED you?
>I would propose that we allow the
>report to be submitted but add an outline describing how we arrived at the
>conclusions we did. The results form the polls / voting can be included so
>that the board can see exactly how many people were in favor of what. It
>will also give them a clear example of why it is important to provide
future
>wg's with an exact definition. Didn't we already decide how this WG
defined
>consensus? Perhaps you could include a "minority opinion" if you disagree.
>That does not seem out of order.
I'm trying to determine the MAJORITY OPINION HERE ERIC.
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Hermes Network, Inc.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|