Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH creation and constituencies' debate

[Luca Muscarà <muscara@unive.it>]

Bret Busby wrote:

> Luca Muscarà wrote:
> >
>
> > Dear members,
> >
> > after three weeks, it seems to me that this WG is often caught in between two
> > opposing ways of thinking: one that consists of an epistemological reflection
> > on the adequacy, fairness and democracy of current processes and procedures;
> > and another--more pragmatical and practical--that tries to find the best
> > solution not in absolute terms, but relative to the given timeframes and
> > contexts. Beside taking a lot of time and creating difficulties in managing
> > this WG for the Chairs, this dialectic should be considered IMHO one of the
> > main reasons of interest of this WG and should be to some extent preserved,
> > without harming of course the functioning of the whole process.
> >
> > Regards to all,
> >
> > Luca Muscarà
> >
>
> What?
>
> Translation please, in plain english.
>
> --
>
> Bret Busby
>
> Armadale, West Australia
>
> ......................................
> "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the
> answer means."
>  - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
>  - Douglas Adams, 1988
> ......................................

Sorry Bret,

if I used some esoteric terminology, I will try again.
I understand that as in any political system also in this WG there is always one
tendency that calls for a more radical approach to change and another more
concerned about keeping up with the premises and promises, on deadlines, etc. I
thought the dialogue between these two creates--despite a few problems--a fruitful
cooperative process that could be furtherly improved if maintained.

Luca Muscarà
Rome, Italy

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html