RE: [wg-review] 11. IDNH - Clean Motion

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

I have been working with Joop over the past few weeks on various documents
and this is the first "mistake" I have made. He is right in this instance
and what is absurd is to read any more into it than that.  I am flattered by
the energy you are giving the campaign to diminish my contributions. Clearly
you seek to tarnish my very good reputation for hard work and a willingness
to work with colleagues within this group, although I cannot imagine why.
Joanna Lane

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Jefsey Morfin
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:40 AM
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH - Clean Motion


Dear Chair, Greg,
I certainly understand that ignorance and enthusiasm in a new cause one
believes to defend may lead to some mistakes. But it is not acceptable to
use in a motion a text whose the author has recognized as an error. What
may be acceptable as an humorous flame  becomes in this context such a
incredible summ of absurdities that it unconsiders the whole WG-Review.

As an active Member of the @large international community and having
presented the two initial motions that this text is supposed to oppose, I
feel personnally concerned by the text proposed by Mrs. Joana Lane. I
suppose that all the Members @large on his WG-Reveiw also feel hurt. All
this is a perfect illustration of the post of Mr. Kent Crispin.

Jesey Morfin
Chair, france@large

On 19:23 15/01/01, Joanna Lane said:
> > > >The @large is
> > > >1.  a disorganized group of all Internet users' diverse interests.
> > > >2.  without Charter or Mission statement
> > > >3. without means of the members to contact each other
> > > >4.  subject to a Study that may reduce its representation on the
> Board or do
> > > >     away with it altogether
> > > >5.  represented by Directors that may be representing interests
directly
> > > >     opposed to typical DN holders' interests.
> > > >6.  top-down and controlled by ICANN staff.
> > > >7.  Unable to provide policy formulations to the ICANN Board


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html