<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH - Clean Motion
At 10:40 PM 1/15/01, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>I certainly understand that ignorance and enthusiasm in a new cause one
>believes to defend may lead to some mistakes. But it is not acceptable to
>use in a motion a text whose the author has recognized as an error.
Which text, precisely, has the author recognized as an error, and who is
the author? If you are not the author, it is inappropriate to claim what
the author or authors can claim for themselves. If you are referring to the
distinctions drawn by Joop, they are not part of any motion.
>As an active Member of the @large international community and having
>presented the two initial motions that this text is supposed to oppose, I
>feel personnally concerned by the text proposed by Mrs. Joana Lane. I
>suppose that all the Members @large on his WG-Reveiw also feel hurt.
Speaking for myself, who has been an atlarge member for quite some time -
you suppose incorrectly.
Regards,
Greg
Regards,
Greg
sidna@feedwriter.com
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|