Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/15/01 11:08:33 PM, Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com> wrote:

>At 06:48 PM 1/15/01, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>>This is an important point. Important enough for a more formal poll.
>>With permission of the Chair, I will put up four more polling questions in
>>the Booth:
>
>I'd like to see these, with the following addition, and a question on 
>phrasing answered first.
>
>Since the motion referenced in the "Clean Motion" thread has been made and 
>seconded, I believe the first question should be whether or not the WG 
>wants to adopt that motion formally.
>
>>1. Should in your opinion the constituency structure of the DNSO be 
>>abandoned altogether?
>>  Yes/No/ No opinion
>
>Do you mean here "the concept of formal constituencies" or "the election of 
>the NC by constituencies"? Those questions might lead to different results, 
>so phrasing is important.

I would also add the word "current" above.  Making it: Should in your opinion the *current* constituency structure of the DNSO be 
abandoned altogether?  It's the status quo we're dissatisfied with.  Clearly, some form of constituency system will be required.  Just not the current one. 


>>2. If the Constituency structure is retained, do you favour the addition of
>>an Individual DN Holder constituency?
>>YES/NO
>>
>>3. If the  Constituency structure is retained, do you favour  a reduction
>>of NC seats belonging to the existing constituencies and redistribution of
>>seats in order to more evenly balance opposing interests?
>>YES/NO/ other (please specify)
>>
>>4. If the Constituency structure is abandoned, how would you want to
>>represent the Individual Domain Name holders on the Names Council?
>>
>>-not at all
>>-turn the GA into an electoral college for the NC
>>-other: please specify on the comment line
>>(multiple choice possible)
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Greg
>
>sidna@feedwriter.com
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>



--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html