Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/16/01 1:37:19 AM, Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com> wrote:

>I would also add the word "current" above.  Making it: Should in your opinion the *current* constituency structure of the DNSO be 
>abandoned altogether?  It's the status quo we're dissatisfied with.  Clearly, some form of constituency system will be required.  Just not the current one. 

Woops!  Should sound more like:  In your opinion, should the *current* constituency structure of the DNSO be 
abandoned altogether?

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Netowork, Inc.


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html