RE: [wg-review] Report Comments

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|>-----Original Message-----
|>From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
|>Behalf Of Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
|>Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 11:50 AM
|>To: wg-review@dnso.org
|>Subject: Re: [wg-review] Report Comments
|>
|>
|>I agree that at least two constituencies ought to be added to
|>the DNSO; >namely, an Individual Domain Name Holders Constituency
and a Consumer
|>Constituency.

I'm glad you included the "at least".  One idea I have been
considering is the formation of a group to represent the interests of
resource providers on the Internet.  The majority of resources are
either associated with domain names or IP addresses although the
providers may not necessarily have rights over those domain names or
IP addresses.  I know that these could be included in the AtLarge
group, but do not consider that would be viable representation.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html