Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH - Clean Motion

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Hello Jefsey and Greg,

Can I add to what Greg said here?

To avoid unnecessary misunderstanding in this WG,
let me reiterate the situation. I am going to submit "Jan. 15. 2001" report
which was asked by NC. No more no less than that.

After going through hustle and bustle from issue-cracking through election
since Dec 23, finally this group is about to be in place to work on "Review"
itself.

The main reason I initially didn't put any of your motions in the report is
they are the one which should be disussed and recognized by this group
in the name of consensus or majority with formal process.

Until then, it is premature to put it as motion which may sound like
consensus in some sense.

That is the challenge WG review has to explore with Greg from now on
and if you don't mind I am happy to facilitate that process with him, too.
Therefore, WG Review is supposed to come up with its own consesus
on Feb. 20.

Please, focus your energies on the next step!!

Thanks,
YJ

> >I certainly understand that ignorance and enthusiasm in a new cause one
> >believes to defend may lead to some mistakes. But it is not acceptable to
> >use in a motion a text whose the author has recognized as an error.
>
> Which text, precisely, has the author recognized as an error, and who is
> the author? If you are not the author, it is inappropriate to claim what
> the author or authors can claim for themselves. If you are referring to
the
> distinctions drawn by Joop, they are not part of any motion.
>
> >As an active Member of the @large international community and having
> >presented the two initial motions that this text is supposed to oppose, I
> >feel personnally concerned by the text proposed by Mrs. Joana Lane. I
> >suppose that all the Members @large on his WG-Reveiw also feel hurt.
>
> Speaking for myself, who has been an atlarge member for quite some time -
> you suppose incorrectly.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> sidna@feedwriter.com
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>










--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html