Re: [wg-review] Re: [cctld-discuss] Comments on review of DNSOby MrPark

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

If we put the issue of money aside are we all in agreement that ICANN must
work in a multi-lingual capacity?

Jefsey Morfin wrote:

> Dear Oscar,
> the wg-review motion/voting system has poorly worked in spite of the
> efforts of Joop Teemstra, so none of my seconded and accepted motions has
> been voted upon.
>
> I had motioned as one cause of the DNSO consensus problems the language
> issue and proposed that no one could participate to an ICANN ML if he had
> not at least two languages. The point was not so much about English as I
> explained, but because it would help the people to hear, listen and may be
> understand better each others.
>
> Jefsey Morfin
> Chair, france@large
>
> At 17:12 16/01/01, Oscar A. Robles Garay wrote:
> >I strongly support Pilar's comments, as long as we publish documents just
> >in english we are contributing on the ICANN "language divide" which, of
> >course, translates into poor representativeness...
> >
> >Oscar Robles
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
begin:vcard 
n:Dierker;Eric
tel;fax:(858) 571-8497
tel;work:(858) 571-8431
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:Eric@Hi-Tek.com
end:vcard