ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] [IDNH] Poll result: on election method of NC members


http://www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/cfm/results.cfm?TID=187


Election of NC members independent of the constituency structure

Total number of voters: 20

NO           4                        20%
No opinion     2                    10%
YES           14                   70%

Comments: 
·       Partly 
·       I would like to see more constituencies with representatives in a
higher
level from which the NC candidates are chosen. So, it is a layered approach. 
·       first an dsecond nomination should however be reserved to the SIG, IC,
etc... accepted/yearly confirmed bythe GA 
·       I have sought clarification of the relationship between the
constituencies and the Names Council, on the mailing list, and, none has been
forthcoming. I am unable to make an informed vote. 
·       Unless base (IDNH/IDNO) constituency is established first. 
·       But ONLY if this means that candidates who were nominated, from within
any constituency (or without) were still ELECTED by a MAJORITY in the GA (i.e.
that their names would go on a GA vote ballot, open to all. (or no "consensus"
from me!) 



--Joop--
www.idno.org

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>