[wg-review] [IDNH} Poll results on Abandoning the Constituency structure

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

http://www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/cfm/results.cfm?TID=186


Abandoning the constituency structure altogether

Total number of voters: 25

Against    8         32%
For         16         64%
No Opinion 1       4%.

Comments: 
·       Let's be realistic about what this WG can achieve 
·       The current set is bad. The concept probably so. But there may be
worse
alternatives, so we need to see the next step before we throw out the current
structure. 
·       They should be a part of the structure, I would like to see additional
layers above them however. 
·       Possibly, yes. Constituencies resemble to political parties in Italy.
They intercept and use the vote of the people to rule the power on their own.
For this reason either we should first get a dedicated constituency and then
try to change the system. 
·       I have asked for clarification of this, on the mailing list, and, no
response has been forthcoming. I am unable to make an informed vote. 
·       I would like to see IDNH/IDNO as a primary or base constituency, upon
which all other secondary constituencies are co-dependent. 
·       One domain, one vote? 
·       I assume that "for" means that I'm voting "yes" to abandon
constituencies. 
·       BECAUSE THE EXISTING ICANN BoDs HAVE SHOWN THE EASE IN WHICH THEY CAN
ABUSE IT. 



--Joop--
www.idno.org

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html