RE: [wg-review] Clarifications requested

["Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>]

YJ,

I've read the string of messages under this subject heading and am somewhat
surprised to see that there remains some confusion about the deadline for
the working group's report per it's mandate. The revised deadline has been
known since the working group's establishment, and reminders were sent out.
For your convenience, I've attached for the working group the reminder sent
to you as Chair of this working group on the deadline for the working
group's comments based on it's mandate (a reminder of the revised deadline
was also sent to each constituency representative, GA chair and co-chair,
the task force receiving comments from all, and the NC). As you know, the
adjustment made in the schedule for the DNSO review is to accommodate the
working group's deadline of Jan. 15th, as set when the working group and
it's mandate were established.

Thanks

Theresa

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of YJ Park (MINC)
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 11:35 AM
> To: YJ Park (MINC); jo-uk@rcn.com; J J Teernstra
> Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested
>
>
> > > Who is doing proposals as per YJ and what form do they take?
> > > Does the questionnaire have to be completed by Monday, or is the
> proposed
> > > completion date now February 2Oth?
> >
> > We should do it until Feb 20th.
>
> Sorry for using "until" again in this context ....
> I am not suggesting this should be wrapped up.
>
> On Feb. 20, review WG's first interim or progress report will be submited
> to NC until this group finishes its mission.
>
> Thanks,
> YJ
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

Emanuel.exe