[wg-review] RE: question.. RE: ccTLD constituency and DNSO review comments

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

Hello Theresa! and Hello ccTLD constituents!

Theresa, Given the time constraints, the ccTLD could not realisticly offer
consensus position or comment on the (original) WG terms of reference.

You can well imagine, based on the difficulty of getting the work of
WG_REVIEW over christmas holidays, and the slow start there, just how
difficult it is to mobilize 244 countries.

However, we (ccTLD)  have scheduled two interim face to face meetings,
Hawaii Feb 1 and Geneve, Feb 19, (which will be attended by ICANN staff)  -,
we intend to discuss further these important matters and offer a document
before the March ICANN meeting- whether or not the document fits within the
WG time limit guidelines.

ccTLD members: please get your comments in to ccTLD discuss list, or bring
them to one of the above-referenced meetings, if you are attending.

Peter de Blanc
Chair
ccTLD AdCom





-----Original Message-----
From: Theresa Swinehart [mailto:Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 5:22 AM
To: pdeblanc@usvi.net; Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr; orobles@nic.mx
Subject: question.. RE: ccTLD constituency and DNSO review comments


Peter, Oscer, Elisabeth,

In going through comments received I didn't see anything specific to the
cctld constituency. I just want to make sure I haven't missed anything -- i
do hope there are some from the cctlds..

Please let me know if there are specific comments from the cctlds, or just
confirm that nothing has been missed.

(i have been following the working group list, etc...).

kind regards,

theresa


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theresa Swinehart [mailto:Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 2:25 PM
> To: pdeblanc@usvi.net; Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr; orobles@nic.mx
> Subject: ccTLD constituency and DNSO review comments
>
>
> Dear Representatives of the DNSO ccTLD Constituency,
>
> This note is just to remind you that any additional comments to
> the DNSO Review Questionnaire from your constituency are now due
> on January 15th to the NC Review Task Force. A reminder of this
> extension was sent out to the NC Task Force and Names Council on
> December 29th.
>
> Any comments already received prior to the extension following
> the Marina del Ray NC meeting, or the December 21st press release
> noting the January 15th extension, will of course be
> automatically be included, and there is no need to resend those.
>
> kind regards,
>
> Theresa

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html