Re: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference

["Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <rod@cyberspaces.org>]

I agree w/ Joanna on the conference call timing issue, otherwise, I doubt I
will be able to join the call.

Rod


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
To: "Roeland Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference


> It is unreasonable to expect colleagues in Europe and N. America to be
> capable of functioning at their best between 4am and 7am or Midnight and
3am
> respectively, even if they are willing and able to attend. I would suggest
> 9pm-11pm GMT ( 4pm-6pm EST USA, 6-8am Wednesday EST Australia).
> Joanna
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Roeland Meyer
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 7:44 AM
> To: 'YJ Park (MINC)'; wg-review@dnso.org
> Cc: board@minc.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference
>
>
> Logistics:
> 1) How does one register for a port?
> 2) Is there a further notification process?
>
> Agenda:
> 1) IMHO 4 and 5 are inter-tied. If we are considering the MHSC suggestion
of
> abolishing the constituencies and having the GA elect all the NC seats
then
> 4 becomes irrelevent. However, if we wish to consider some compromise
> proposal (making the GA another constituency), then we still have to take
4
> and 5 together. Only with status quo can we consider them separately.
>
> 2) I disagree that 8 has any place at this low a level. It should be up at
> ICANN BoD level because it is an ICANN-wide problem.
>
> 3) WRT item 2, what next period?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: YJ Park (MINC) [mailto:yjpark@minc.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 10:28 PM
> > To: wg-review@dnso.org
> > Cc: board@minc.org
> > Subject: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference
> >
> >
> > Hello WG-Review members,
> >
> > Appreciating MINC board who has approved to support
> > DNSO WG-Review's teleconference upon the urgent request,
> > I also would like to thank Michael Gendron who initially
> > volunteered for the bridge and Greg who tried to sort out issues.
> >
> > I tentatively put 20 people for the teleconference,
> > so it will be of help to notify your participation in advance
> > not to avoid lack of ports just in case people cannot have
> > proper access due to its limited lines.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > YJ
> >
> > ================================
> > Date: 2001. 1. 23. Tuesday. 4:00 AM. GMT
> > ================================
> > Conference Tel : 65 - 668 - 7700
> > Conference code:  517595#
> > Duration: Two hours(with three hours reserved)
> > ================================
> > Conference Chairman: YJ Park
> > No of Participants, WG-Review Members: 20
> > ================================
> > Draft Agenda:
> >
> > 1. Agenda approval
> > 2. Schedule, Work Plans for Next Period
> > 3. Preliminary Report Discussion and Approval
> > 4. Constituencies
> > 5. General Assembly
> > 6. Names Council
> > 7. Work Groups
> > 8. Standardized Procedures and Language/Translation Issues
> > 9. Outreach
> > 10. Draft DNSO Review report, version 1.0
> > 11. AOB
> > ==================================
> > Time Difference
> > ==================================
> > 4:00   GMT
> > 24:00 New York Eastern Time
> > 21:00 California
> > 12:00 Korea, Japan
> > 13:00 Singapore
> >
> > Please visit to
> > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/ for confirmation.
> > ==================================
> >                         [End of Message]
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html