Re: [wg-review] Fourth Concern on DNSO Review Report version 1.0

[Derek Conant <dconant@dnsga.org>]

I don't want to be one who always appears negative and against ICANN.  However,
the ICANN process appears so blatantly wrong and egregious here.

Why ICANN and its supporting organizations hold any forum process or public
comment period at all is only my guess.

ICANN clearly has shown that it will "move forward" with its preconceived plans
at any cost and regardless of any opinion of the majority of interested parties.
What kind of consensus or process is this from the US?

WE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD!
    WE ARE MOVING FORWARD!
WE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD!
    WE ARE MOVING FORWARD!
    WE ARE MOVING FORWARD!

Derek Conant


Sotiropoulos wrote:

> 1/24/01 5:47:15 PM, "YJ Park (MINC)" <yjpark@minc.org> wrote:
>
> <snip>
> ================================================
> >Out of Theresa's report
> >------------------------
> <snip>
> >In this sense, the activities of open fora is important, but debate, and
> >even
> >votes (use of votes in Working Groups is useful for information gathering
> >purposes, but it tends to polarize opinion, and should be used with
> >caution )
> >should be viewed as valuable intellectual inputs into the consensus
> >development process; but they can not be presumed to be the consensus-
> >development process itself.
> >=================================================
>
> Theresa (I presume),
>
> Does this mean they should be presumed *not* to have any place in the
> consensus-development process itself?
>
> Also, excuse my asking, but just what exactly is a "consensus development
> process"; wherefore, wherefrom, and wherewith,  "development"?  Just who
> is *developing* what?  and according to which "process"?  Perhaps you
> can help us with a defintion of "consensus" while you're at it?  After all, I
> have seen no evidence of any process in this entire business!  Perhaps, that
> is the process itself (i.e. non-process)?
>
>
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc.
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html