Re: [wg-review] My Reply to WG-Review Comments

[Derek Conant <dconant@dnsga.org>]

To start, certainly an international Internet constituency should be
representative of a ccTLD.  Also, international groups that represent new
systems, processes and technologies should have constituency representation.

Regardless of ICANN's rhetoric and call for representatives, it does not appear
that ICANN wants any other representatives other than those few players already
positioned within itself.

Derek Conant


Harald Alvestrand wrote:

> At 23:07 23/01/2001 -0500, Derek Conant wrote:
> >The immediate change that is needed is that
> >international Internet constituency representatives should play key
> >roles in the control and management of the DNS.
>
> What <expletive deleted> is an "international Internet constituency
> representative"?
>
> reason for expletive: large swaths of the ICANN process have been trying to
> come up with who is "representative", and for what.
> If you have a magic formulation, share it before asking us to accept it.
>
>             Harald

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html