RE: I Disagree - Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

That is a rat-hole. Sotriris, you know that this is technically infeasible.
Derek may be ignorant, but you're not.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sotiropoulos [mailto:sotiris@hermesnetwork.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 2:41 PM
> To: Derek Conant; Greg Burton
> Cc: wg Review list
> Subject: Re: I Disagree - Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] 
> Discussion
> 
> 
> 1/26/01 4:54:57 PM, Derek Conant <dconant@dnsga.org> wrote:
> 
> >If the WG is going to use votes for its direction, voters 
> should be identified so
> >that WG contributing participants know that the votes and 
> voters are legitimate.
> 
> I fully concur and second this motion (that is, if it is one!?!).
> 
> 
> 
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc. 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html