Re: I Disagree - Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion

[Derek Conant <dconant@dnsga.org>]

Before I begin here, I share with you Mr. Meyer that I am disappointed with
your not having better articulated your opinion while opposing my point of
view.  Surely, you could have better articulated your opinion and comment
against me and shown more control or restraint.  Imagine if everyone here
directed such abusive language to a WG participant, if you can.  There is no
time for that here and that will not get the job done here.

I do not believe that any of my comments to this WG and ICANN have shown any
ignorance on my part.

Derek Conant


Roeland Meyer wrote:

> That is a rat-hole. Sotriris, you know that this is technically infeasible.
> Derek may be ignorant, but you're not.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sotiropoulos [mailto:sotiris@hermesnetwork.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 2:41 PM
> > To: Derek Conant; Greg Burton
> > Cc: wg Review list
> > Subject: Re: I Disagree - Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies]
> > Discussion
> >
> >
> > 1/26/01 4:54:57 PM, Derek Conant <dconant@dnsga.org> wrote:
> >
> > >If the WG is going to use votes for its direction, voters
> > should be identified so
> > >that WG contributing participants know that the votes and
> > voters are legitimate.
> >
> > I fully concur and second this motion (that is, if it is one!?!).
> >
> >
> >
> > Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> >           Hermes Network, Inc.
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html