RE: [wg-review] Are we dead?
Greg et
al,
Apologies for my
lack of participation over the last few days. I have been heavily committed
elsewhere and just now catching up on the posts. More later.
Joanna
-----Original Message----- At 08:58 PM 1/27/01, Babybows.com wrote:From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Greg Burton Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 4:58 PM To: Babybows.com Cc: wg-review@dnso.org Subject: Re: [wg-review] Are we dead? Still awaiting a clarification& did the Names Council terminate the Review Working Group? No, the names council did NOT terminate the Working Group. At the moment it seems more likely that the WG is terminating itself by lack of response on substantive matters. That's a shame, because not only did people say they wanted to continue, they wanted a structure and the ability to focus on specific issues. They asked for rules, and clear procedures. They wanted a majority vote to be a majority vote, and not called consenus. Thanks to a lot of volunteer work, we have those things in place. Joanna Lane did a wonderful website for organizing our material, the polling booth is working I'm very puzzled by this. Any clarification from members of the WG - publicly or privately - would be most welcome. Greg sidna@feedwriter.com
|