<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[wg-review] IDNH/O versus @LARGE
The DNSO is responsible for recommending *domain name policy* and not making ICANN re-
organization recommendations (even if they don't *appear* as such!). Also, the @Large is not
responsible for policy recommendations. The functions of the proposed IDNH/O and the
@Large are therefore quite distinct, and *must not* be lumped together in some sort of simplified
revision of the facts. Finally, IDNH/O membership imples domain holdership/ownership, this is
*not* the case or qualification for the @Large membership.
This WG has not effectively sanctioned any correlation between the @Large and the IDNH/O!!!!!!!!!
Any such revisionary activity is highly suspect and culpable. Are you listening T. Swineheart?
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Hermes Network, Inc.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|