<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] RE: Is there anybody out there...?
It would be extremely helpful for us diminutive aspiring compilers of information if threads like this would be openly
and obviously placed into a proper heading.
I mean nothing personal and only use this as an example and friendly reminder.
Sotiropoulos wrote:
> Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com> wrote:
>
> >Um, was your report ready to be voted on? If so, I apologize for not
> >scheduling a vote - I was under the impression you were producing several
> >more reports before we adopted them.
>
> Actually, my report was divided into three sections of relevance. The first section, which *was*
> submitted, dealt with the DNDEF question, in and of itself. The other two sections of the report deal with
> Procedure and Outreach, respectively. Since my first report was effectively ignored, I have been loth to continue
> report submissions, until I understand exactly what is going on in this WG.
>
> (As for the remuneration question... at least now we know that Roeland, yourself, and myself, are not being payed
> to be here.)
>
>
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> Hermes Network, Inc.
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> Hermes Network, Inc.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|