Re: [wg-review] IDNH/O versus @LARGE

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/29/01 5:08:46 PM, Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM> wrote:

>It would seem that this discrepancy can be solved by strong language which unequivocally states dilution is not 
what is
>intended, and mixing it with the At Large is not intended.  Why be offended? Just correct it and move on. In 
otherwords take
>issue with the premise not the why and by whom it was stated.

That's exactly what I'm doing.  I didn't see anyone else point it out until I piped up, did you? 

Oh, and I'm not offended in the least.  Not really challenged though, either... which is what really disturbs me.





Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc. 


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html