Re: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!

[Derek Conant - DNSGA <dconant@dnsga.org>]

I am happy to see that you voted.  That's 1 vote!  Where
did the other 24 votes come from?

*   Mr. Stubbs indicated that he did not vote.
*   I did not vote.

Let's get one thing straight here, how can anyone here expect to develop this WG membership and participation when the very foundation of this WG itself does not know where its votes for direction are coming from? 

The voting problem is a real issue and I believe that it needs to be addressed first, or else, the participants in this WG appear to be only passing time together discussing large subject matters that this WG will never have the influence to advance.

Who else in this WG voted?

Derek Conant
 

Eric Dierker wrote:

Well shucks, Derek I voted but the nonconformist in me does not want to
admit the truth that I was in the majority on every issue.  Hold on a second
it just hit me, I did not vote with the majority, they voted with me!!!

Derek and others we have more to do on constituencies and should be rocking
and rolling on the GA by now.  The hard work of Dassa on the specifics of
forming a new constituency, Joanna's web site, the work just turned in by
Greg and of course the procedures for consensus building are huge
contributions. Let's build on what we have started.  Remember that no matter
how the reports are received and used by the Force or the DNSO good work
will be used by many for proposals in the future.

Does any one know if the GA has a specific item of discussion right now.
Obviously the problem with the empty chair needs to be remedied by better
procedure.  Are they a large rudderless ship at the moment?

Sincerely,

Derek Conant - DNSGA wrote:

> I do not get paid for my participation here, however, I wish I were
> getting paid for it.  I would enjoy dedicating all of my time and
> resources to this US/DoC/ICANN/DNSO/WG vs. Planet Earth.  If anyone here
> admits to getting paid for their participation in this WG I'll say: -
> Hurray for you and how can I do that?!  What's wrong with getting paid?
>
> Is there any reason why all of the participants in this WG cannot
> identify whether they voted or not?  This WG is small enough that the
> participants here could indicate if they voted or not.  In such a small
> WG as this, I do not see any problem with voters indicating whether they
> voted or not.  However, voters should not be obligated to indicate how
> they voted.
>
> I'll admit that I did not vote.  Apparently, my vote really would not of
> counted had I voted anyway.
>
> Derek Conant
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html