Re: [wg-review] Submission One for Wg-Review, The DNSO Constituencies. - Dassa.

[DPF <david@farrar.com>]

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:57:22 +1100, Dassa wrote:

>1.0 The DNSO set a mimimum membership level for any constituency at 500 members.  

That would make it impossible for the ccTLDs.

>2.0 Name Council Representatives are elected from within the 
>Constituency Assembly, not directly from the Constituencies.   

This can lead to total control of Names Council with one constituency.
Let's say one constituency ends up with 5,000 members and the other
seven have 500 each.  The Constituency Assembly would have 17 members
and the one large constituency would have an absolute majority to
appoint the entire Names Council.

>This submission is made in the form of ideas for discussion and consideration.  

While disagreeing with some, there is much worth considering.

DPF
________________________________________________________________________
<david at farrar dot com>
NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html