RE: [wg-review] Submission One for Wg-Review, The DNSO Constituencies. - Dassa.

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|>-----Original Message-----
|>From: On Behalf Of Peter de Blanc
|>Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 5:37 AM
|>Subject: RE: [wg-review] Submission One for Wg-Review, The DNSO Constituencies. - Dassa.
|>
|>Darryl:
|>
|>The ccTLD Constituency, of which I am a member, consists of 
|>the managers of
|>244 ccTLDs.
|>
|>That is all there is.
|>
|>I can not support your position because my constituency would 
|>be dis-allowed under your rule #1, below.

I can appreciate the fact and that to allow the inclusion of special interest groups with limited numbers it may be necessary to adjust the figures.  The figures I quoted are for a starting point in discussion.

There is also the alternative, where such existing constituencies alter their membership structure to include not only the top level managers but also lower level positions.  In your own case with the ccTLD's, there is not only the Managers involved in their implementation.  It can be supposed that each ccTLD has a full management staff.  This would equate to only needing 2-3 members from each of the ccTLD's on average to meet the threshold level.  To me, that would make it more representative as there would be potentially more input.  Also in the case of ccTLD's, there would be interested parties from Government and other organizations that would be willing to participate if offered the chance, also users of the ccTLD services.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html