ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!


Well, did you vote?

Derek Conant


Joop Teernstra wrote:

> At 00:39 31/01/01 -0500, Derek Conant - DNSGA wrote:
>
> >> >Is there any reason why all of the participants in this WG cannot
> >> >identify whether they voted or not?  This WG is small enough that the
> >> >participants here could indicate if they voted or not.  In such a small
> >> >WG as this, I do not see any problem with voters indicating whether they
> >> >voted or not.  However, voters should not be obligated to indicate how
> >> >they voted.
> >> >
>
> For future votes, it is perfectly possible for all voters to indicate THAT
> they voted, without indicating how they voted.
> All they need to do is enter their name on the comment line.
>
> The list of names will appear in the results under "comments".
>
> Whether the listmembers will want this, is another question.
> First, a motion has to made to the Chair and if the motion is opposed, the
> issue would have to be voted on.
>
> --Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
> the Cyberspace Association and
> the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
> Elected representative.
> http://www.idno.org
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>