Re: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

Dear Joop,

This is a good idea, thank you for making it so simple.  Of course if someone
does not want to that is O.K. and also tells us something of value.

Sincerely,

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> At 00:39 31/01/01 -0500, Derek Conant - DNSGA wrote:
>
> >> >Is there any reason why all of the participants in this WG cannot
> >> >identify whether they voted or not?  This WG is small enough that the
> >> >participants here could indicate if they voted or not.  In such a small
> >> >WG as this, I do not see any problem with voters indicating whether they
> >> >voted or not.  However, voters should not be obligated to indicate how
> >> >they voted.
> >> >
>
> For future votes, it is perfectly possible for all voters to indicate THAT
> they voted, without indicating how they voted.
> All they need to do is enter their name on the comment line.
>
> The list of names will appear in the results under "comments".
>
> Whether the listmembers will want this, is another question.
> First, a motion has to made to the Chair and if the motion is opposed, the
> issue would have to be voted on.
>
> --Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
> the Cyberspace Association and
> the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
> Elected representative.
> http://www.idno.org
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html