ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!


Forrester,
 
If you think about is, that argument is as ugly as it gets. It is the same argument that anti-privacy advocates use for their cause. Using that argument, unltimately, requires us all to walk around without clothes, just to prove that we have nothing to hide.
-----Original Message-----
From: FRupp@aol.com [mailto:FRupp@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 9:13 AM
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!

I voted at Joops Poll and Sotiris's too...

A question for all....why wouldn't anyone want their position or stand, to be
noted for the record, and open to the public for comparison to public
statements (you) made in support (or against) a policy or issue.

If we are to be open and transparent I for one would welcome (COMPLETE
OPENNESS) Voting records, contact info, Statements of Positions regarding
ICANN and DNSO ...Actions/Motions and/or Policies being voted on...

Seems to me, only those with a hidden agenda or are presenting a false
represtentation of their views (then voting the other way) ....wouldn't want
complete openness...
JMO...AV (and view)

Forrester Rupp
frupp@aol.com


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>