ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!


I agree with the conclusion, however I must say that sometimes after stating a position I am educated to a point where I change my mind.  The very clear problem with my agenda is that I suffer from partially delusional idealism, and I can't keep that pesky little problem of morality out of the equation. I keep having these visions that somehow the internet can be "governed" in the best interests of the users.

Sincerely,

FRupp@aol.com wrote:

I voted at Joops Poll and Sotiris's too...

A question for all....why wouldn't anyone want their position or stand, to be
noted for the record, and open to the public for comparison to public
statements (you) made in support (or against) a policy or issue.

If we are to be open and transparent I for one would welcome (COMPLETE
OPENNESS) Voting records, contact info, Statements of Positions regarding
ICANN and DNSO ...Actions/Motions and/or Policies being voted on...

Seems to me, only those with a hidden agenda or are presenting a false
represtentation of their views (then voting the other way) ....wouldn't want
complete openness...
JMO...AV (and view)

Forrester Rupp
frupp@aol.com



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>