<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Fwd: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!
- To: jo-uk@rcn.com
- Subject: Re: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!
- From: FRupp@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:01:08 EST
- Full-name: FRupp
In a message dated 1/31/01 9:58:39 AM Pacific Standard Time, jo-uk@rcn.com
writes:
How an individual votes is of no public interest whatsoever unless the
person is an official elected to represent a particular point of view.
(We) are here to "form something" that the DNSO review TF (will) represent as
concensus (on issues and directions to take)...thus we do "represent"
particular points of view...while (we may not be elected) the effect/result
is the same...
The TF will present its "Official Suggestions" as representative of our
"consensus"...and without records of WG-Review participants votes or policy
positions...there is ...only the TF statements, and no substantiation of the
suggestions they make/offer, or if (Our Suggestions/Opinions) are/were even
presented (or presented accurately) by the review TF.
Forrester Rupp
Frupp@aol.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|