RE: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!
Forrester,
I'm sorry, but you
are suffering from delusions of grandeur. I'm sure you could find many
like-minded people who would agree with your opinions, as could I, but you are
not here with a mandate from anyone (I assume), and therefore accountable to
noone. That's the difference.
Joanna
-----Original Message----- In a message dated 1/31/01 9:58:39 AM Pacific Standard Time,
jo-uk@rcn.com From: FRupp@aol.com [mailto:FRupp@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 2:01 PM To: jo-uk@rcn.com Subject: Re: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted! writes: How an individual votes is of no public interest whatsoever unless the (We) are here to "form something" that the DNSO review TF (will) represent as concensus (on issues and directions to take)...thus we do "represent" particular points of view...while (we may not be elected) the effect/result is the same... The TF will present its "Official Suggestions" as representative of our "consensus"...and without records of WG-Review participants votes or policy positions...there is ...only the TF statements, and no substantiation of the suggestions they make/offer, or if (Our Suggestions/Opinions) are/were even presented (or presented accurately) by the review TF. Forrester Rupp Frupp@aol.com |