Re: [wg-review] Constituencies, 1 governance and legality

[Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>]

On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Kent Crispin wrote:

> > As for your question, you got much of my position right, but not all:  In
> > no way am I saying that the at-large members "should"  engage in legal
> > action - such a decision rests with each individual member.  I personally
> > don't want to see such action,
>
> Nonetheless, you are clearly encouraging it by making the public
> statements that you are making -- it is pretty clear from some of the
> mail on this list that some parties are encouraged :-)

I would suggest that if you want to start talking about who is putting
ICANN at risk then I suggest that you ask about the sense of those who try
to embed very questionable exclusions into the bylaws and then have to
waste money and public credibility by attempting to defend them.

		--karl--




--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html