Re: [wg-review] RE: [PRIVATE]

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

>Nope, what I sent you was light-weight, compared to what I sent him. Let's
>see if he publicizes what I sent him? Then we'll know if we have more than
>one netiquette violator in our midst. I think I hit the mark pretty close.

Actually Roeland, with you, that makes two of us already, huh?

You know Roeland, if you had labelled your original mail PRIVATE or OFFLIST I would
not have made it public.  Instead, not only did you fail to do so, but you sent it to several 
other members of the WG.  Now, I don't know what (if any) relations you have with any 
of the others, but who are you to try to colour my opinion of another Member of the WG?  And,
if some of us should know, don't you think everyone should?

I know Mr. Derek Conant as well as I know you Roeland(i.e., not at all).  You have no right 
to do what you did, no matter how you wish to paint it.  You know what you did was wrong.
Now, you're trying to squirm away from the responsibility.  

Now, if I violated netiquette, so did you.  But, I guess you're of the opinion that two wrongs 
*do* make a right, huh?

Roeland, you are a disappointment.  Save some face and apologize to Mr. Conant.




Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc. 


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html