Re: Really?! - [wg-review] Re: Voters should indicate they voted!

[Derek Conant - DNSGA <dconant@dnsga.org>]

Sorry for appearing so brutal with my statement below.  However, to
limit WG communication regarding subject matter is definitely not the
right thing to do, unless the communication is clearly not of any real
substance or lacks merit concerning the advancement of this WG.

This WG should not promote limiting relevant communication that serves
this WG.

[MOTION]  Let's vote on whether we should solve the voting problem that
I have raised.

Instead of the Chair and/or Co-chair of this WG suggesting the
above-mentioned motion, they have allowed this matter to continue like
it has.  To their credit, maybe it was their way of acknowledging that
the voting matter I raised has merit while answers to the voting problem
were being developed here.  That is what this WG is for.

Derek Conant


"Miles B. Whitener" wrote:

> What's your point?
> You seem to be adding to the flame-like noise on the list that
> people are complaining about.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Derek Conant - DNSGA" <dconant@dnsga.org>
> To: "Miles B. Whitener" <mbw@i-theta.com>
> Cc: "Kent Crispin" <kent@songbird.com>; "Wg-Review"
> <wg-review@dnso.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 12:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Really?! - [wg-review] Re: Voters should indicate
> they voted!
>
> > And, if certain members of this WG submit comments that do not
> conform
> > to what the Chair wants, those WG participants could be bound,
> gagged
> > and hog-tied too.
> >
> > Derek Conant
> >
> >
> > "Miles B. Whitener" wrote:
> >
> > > > In WG-C, a rule was imposed that limited people to 3 posts
> per
> > > day.  It
> > > > definitely helped considerably.
> > >
> > > This seems to be a good idea, if there's nothing better.
> > > The only suggestion I'd make is that it should be clear that
> the
> > > chair can change this value as needed.  In time-critical
> > > situations, chair might want to up the limit and hope the
> flamers
> > > will be quiet.
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org
> list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html